Update to the TOTSB post’s “* update”
I error, 2113 and 2014 are the next elections, thank you Mrs Clemons. I clarify, I or anyone else that I know has filed a Recall, what I said was train and plan. Again, I did not say Mrs Clemons’ replacement, I will continue to make efforts to remove Mr Hudson. Over 300 citizens wanted him recalled, I failed them so I would like to correct my failure. To those that are thinking of running just be honest and leave individuals out of it, address issues. Folks, if your dog goes missing, or dead chicken on your fence or paint on your mailbox, where did the suggestion come from, TOTSB. There are some that seems to have forgotten who started the name calling and accusations. But; there are individuals that have every email, letter, post and face book entry, written. These items are why I and some others have gotten involved, attacks without proof, name calling and SLAMMING. We must always remember that Mrs Clemons made her own choices, from the VERY beginning. Again you only need to be honest.
It is also sad that everyone in Ellicott is corrupt except for two individuals, one board member and a past board member. Yes past, Mrs Clemons’ resignation was accepted last night with a vote 3-0, with Mr Hudson not in attendances. How even the Election Board is corrupt. What does Mr Williams have to gain? Mr Williams just followed the law, evidence from one petition could not be used in the other. Three separate cases. Eventho most of the evidence from Mr Hudson was not allowed. Speaking of false statements. Again Mrs Clemons made the decision not to be present which may have put her case at a disadvantage. If anyone has an issue it is 3Cs and SOS because the law has changed concerning Appeals and Mr Williams did not enforce the change. Mrs Clemons’ appeal included two-3 names, as her reason for appealing, she is again wrong, accusations without checking.
To Mrs Clemons, I tried to explain that the information you are posting concerning one of your neighbor’s daughter, is wrong (I have tried more than once) your response was to SLAM, why do you smear incident individuals? I gave you a chance to correct your postings, sorry you see it differently.
What have others done? assisted in the hiring of Dr Cullen, aided in the design of the new middle school, and suggested the district research why the scores are poor, that three.
To Seriously; is saying “You can’t write at a fourth grade level”, a slam? Or calling a group of citizens “flying monkeys” is that a slam? How about this one, “you were stupid enough”, a slam? Or this one, “If you would like to stop being so “confused” you might consider remedial education or you could stop drinking so much.” Just a few statements as to why I feel people like this does not need to be in a place of responsibility. The statement that “there is one less sex offender amazes you”, no it is the fact that some board member would take credit for it. My purpose was always up front, I do not agree with you or your approach, attacking those that disagreed with you. What, “nor will WE (the board) ever be responsible for the scores.” wasn’t this the Big issue against the past board?
Now Ellicott is a small fish bowl? So I guess the SOS committee is the water changer.
Good-bye Mrs Clemons.
Integrity in Leadership